We value your support now more than ever.

All year we’ve been covering the issues that matter most to you—the pandemic, the election, policing, housing, and more—and now our end of year membership campaign is here. Will you support our work to ensure we can bring you the same informative local reporting in 2021?

While working on this week’s cover story on sex inside Union Station’s men’s rooms, I only saw dick action on my way to the commuter hub. One afternoon, a man at the intersection of 16th and Newton Streets NW lost his pants. He bent over and there it was: ass, balls and the rest. Not pretty. I think his pants just gave up on him and broke.

At a gay bar, a man unzipped his fly and let it…well, you get the idea. He was hitting on me and I guess thought this would be a great idea. I can’t say I looked. So I can’t be certain that he exposed himself at the bar. But I’m pretty sure he did. He and his member seemed to linger out in the open for a while.

Last but certainly not least, while researching an entirely different piece in August, a source let me into his apartment when he just shouldn’t have. I immediately noticed another man laying on the floor by the dining-room table. He was wearing only a white undershirt and white briefs. His chicken legs were spread apart to make room for the box fan airing out his groin.

The icing: The man was clutching a teddy bear.

My point in telling you, dear readers, all this is to ask you for some guidance: As a journalist, what should I have done? Should I have told the man to put on pants? Or should I have kept it real, been that fly on the wall, not changed the news, and simply let the man be in his underpants with that teddy bear?

I chose to ignore Underpants Man. Was this the right thing to do?