City Paper is not for tourists
In April, lawyers for both sides of WAKA LLC v. DC Kickball filed paperwork with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia asking for the case to be dismissed.
The motion was granted.
And so ends the Greatest Kickball Lawsuit of All Time
The federal case was originally filed in February 2006 and involved the folks responsible for turning DC into the adult kickball epicenter.
Those are also pretty much the same rules used by third graders everywhere. No third graders were named as defendants.
The complaint also alleged that Rabasa, a former WAKA volunteer, defamed WAKA by calling the group “the Microsoft of kickball” in a 2005 City Paper story.
Rabasa countersued, alleging in his filings that WAKA used monopolistic tactics on the way to becoming, um, the Microsoft of Kickball
No terms of the settlement are included in the court filings.
However, the DC Kickball website holds clues that Rabasa, who lacked the deep pockets of the, um, Microsoft of Kickball
First, there’s a disclaimer from Rabasa saying that no “defamatory and/or disparaging remarks regarding WAKA” will be allowed on the DC Kickball site.
Then there’s this syntax-challenged announcement labeled as “Apology to WAKA“: “Carter Rabasa, DCKickball and DCK Sports LLC regret and retract the defamatory and/or disparaging statements made regarding WAKA Kickball. Those statement were in error.”
(“Those statement,” huh? Is that a typo, or some sort of juvenile, kickball-age appropriate “I had my fingers crossed when I said I’m sorry!” trick?)
Even with Rabasa’s apparent fold, it’s hard to declare any winner here.
But the losers are legion: Anybody hoping that this case would reach a trial stage, so grownups would argue in a public courtroom over kickball—-or Kickball