Do you have a plan to vote?
Let us tell you the information you need to register and cast a ballot in D.C.
Last week on the Sexist, we debuted our final groping instalment (yes, haters, it is really over). In the final column, Falls Church resident Emily Ruskowski is groped in a Metro parking garage, reports the assault the next day, and eventually helps to catch her assailant in a sting operation.
One reader complained that the story perpetuated a dangerous “myth” surrounding sexual violence: “that even moderate sexual violence is so traumatizing that the appropriate response is not to contact law enforcement immediately.”
Sexual assault trauma: Fact or fiction? Discussed in this edition of Sexist comments of the week:
Rando writes in to de-bunk the myth:
Protip: When you are assaulted, sexually or otherwise, but physically unharmed, and you’re sitting in a locked car in a public space and the perp is walking away and making no threatening motions, and you have a cell phone, a good description of the perp, and his phone number, CALL 911. This persistent myth that even moderate sexual violence is so traumatizing that the appropriate response is not to contact law enforcement immediately does unbelievable harm to future victims of sexual violence. I’m sure I’ll be accused of blaming the victim here, but come on folks, we all need to remind each other that when bad things happen, CALL THE COPS IMMEDIATELY SO THEY CAN CATCH THE SCUMBAGS.
latecomer suggests that perhaps the lack of an immediate response to an assault is not a result of a “persistent myth” of trauma, but rather actual trauma:
@Rando When someone’s traumatized and processing what has happened to them they’re not necessarily able to act so immediately. It sounds like Emily did a great job considering what she went through. That was some pretty aggressive stalking there…
Not so fast: actual evidence of a person being traumatized by a sexual assault does not deter Rando from arguing that that person’s real life experience has created a “myth”:
Latecomer, that’s my point—stories like this reinforce the idea that even moderate assaults like this are so traumatizing that calling the cops just isn’t an option. We need to get past that myth that women are so emotionally fragile that we can’t handle making a 911 call and instead need to call a friend or family member for an hour or more of psychological stabilization before pressing 3 keys on our phones and telling the operator where we are and what the perp looks like.
To be clear, I’m not coming down on the writer personally here, more on CP for putting this story out there as model behavior with a happy ending.
L respectfully disagrees:
Oh, for fuck’s sake, Rando.
1) Clearly, this is not a myth. Clearly. The woman in the article was too traumatized to report right away. This may not be the case for every woman who experiences sexual violence. But being traumatized by sexual assault? That’s totally and completely normal. You’re an asshole for shaming women who feel traumatized after experiencing something traumatic.
2) Reporting or not reporting sexual assault does not cause sexual assault. The person committing sexual assault causes sexual assault. Don’t blame victims for things that really, REALLY aren’t their fault or within their control.
3) Calling the cops WAS an option in this story, because SHE DID CALL THE COPS. Therefore, this post is not promoting any sort of narrative that women are too “emotionally fragile” or whatever to call the police. Did you, by the way, notice how long it took her to get in touch with someone who would actually follow up on her report? The hour she spoke to her friend before calling 911 is nothing in comparison to how long it took her to get someone to pay attention. If there’s blame to be laid anywhere, it’s on the transit cops for not answering her phone calls.
To sum it up, stop being a mansplaining, victim-blaming dick, Rando.
Emily H. is concerned with Rando’s myth that calling the cops immediately will resolve a groping case:
Rando — I hear where you’re coming from, and I agree telling women it’s somehow more appropriate or “normal” to be too freaked out to call the cops is a bad message. But one woman’s story doesn’t send that message, because it *is* just one woman’s story. It’s what really happened, not what society as a whole had decided should happen, and I’d much rather hear the truth.
Also: I was once attacked by a crazy guy while out jogging, and I called 911 as soon as I got away from him. The dude ran to his car and drove away. The cops showed up 20 minutes later (!), and the criminal was long gone. People don’t necessarily expect a quick or useful response from the police, because often they don’t get one.
An ally drops in to provide Rando’s Defense:
Couple of points here in defense of Rando:
1. One person’s story = one person’s story. An article put out in the public space without comment = how myths get perpetuated.
2. 911 responses may be fast and efficient, or they may not be. That is no reason not to call the cops.
Miike snow is unsure exactly how this “myth” would be perpetuated in practice:
Rando, it seems like you just made up an imaginary problem. Nobody in these stories thinks of calling the police but then says, “Oh wait, I’m supposed to be traumatized.” They are just actually traumatized.
And none of these stories are saying your “supposed” to be traumatized. So, I don’t know where you’re getting this “myth” from, but I suspect you actually just have an agenda.
Illustration by Brooke Hatfield.