We know D.C. Get our free newsletter to stay in the know.
Check out the guy, center of the road, toward the back: Uh, oh.
For all the District’s talk of dangerous pedestrian corridors—-and it’s commendable, absolutely—- we’re doing pretty well here. I suspect that this has much less to do with road maps than overall drivers’ attitudes: They know people and vehicles share the road. We look for each other, wave in acknowledgment, and gesture to suggest “No, no, you wait—-I’m gonna keep walking now.”
It works. They apparently have a different way of going about things in Florida, though. Behold, below, a ranking of the worse cities for pedestrians. It’s part of a report, out yesterday, put together by Transportation for America.
D.C.’s below the jump.
Ranking | Metropolitan Area | Average Annual Pedestrian Deaths per 100,000 Residents (2007-2008) |
Percent of Workers Walking to Work (2000) |
Pedestrian Danger Index (PDI) |
1 | Orlando-Kissimmee, FL | 2.86 | 1.3% | 221.5 |
2 | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL | 3.52 | 1.7% | 205.5 |
3 | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL | 3.04 | 1.7% | 181.2 |
4 | Jacksonville, FL | 2.61 | 1.7% | 157.4 |
5 | Memphis, TN-MS-AR | 1.83 | 1.3% | 137.7 |
6 | Raleigh-Cary, NC | 2.02 | 1.6% | 128.6 |
7 | Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN | 1.93 | 1.7% | 114.8 |
8 | Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX | 1.81 | 1.6% | 112.4 |
9 | Birmingham-Hoover, AL | 1.30 | 1.2% | 110.0 |
10 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA | 1.37 | 1.3% | 108.3 |
11 | Las Vegas-Paradise, NV | 2.46 | 2.3% | 105.6 |
12 | Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC | 1.29 | 1.2% | 103.9 |
13 | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | 1.47 | 1.5% | 99.3 |
14 | Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI | 1.41 | 1.4% | 98.5 |
15 | New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA | 2.69 | 2.7% | 98.4 |
16 | Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ | 2.02 | 2.1% | 97.0 |
17 | Oklahoma City, OK | 1.59 | 1.7% | 95.3 |
18 | Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA | 1.94 | 2.2% | 89.5 |
19 | Austin-Round Rock, TX | 1.76 | 2.1% | 84.8 |
20 | Kansas City, MO-KS | 1.18 | 1.4% | 84.6 |
21 | St. Louis, MO-IL | 1.28 | 1.7% | 76.9 |
22 | Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville, CA | 1.64 | 2.2% | 75.9 |
23 | Denver-Aurora, CO | 1.59 | 2.1% | 75.6 |
24 | Richmond, VA | 1.35 | 1.8% | 74.5 |
25 | Tucson, AZ | 1.88 | 2.6% | 72.8 |
26 | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA | 1.30 | 1.8% | 71.9 |
27 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA | 1.91 | 2.7% | 70.8 |
28 | Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN | 1.04 | 1.5% | 70.2 |
29 | Baltimore-Towson, MD | 1.82 | 2.9% | 61.9 |
30 | San Antonio, TX | 1.39 | 2.4% | 58.9 |
31 | Indianapolis-Carmel, IN | 1.00 | 1.7% | 58.6 |
32 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 1.75 | 3.0% | 57.2 |
33 | San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA | 1.89 | 3.4% | 55.7 |
34 | Salt Lake City, UT | 1.04 | 2.1% | 50.2 |
35 | Columbus, OH | 1.16 | 2.3% | 49.4 |
36 | Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY | 1.33 | 2.7% | 49.3 |
37 | Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI | 1.39 | 2.9% | 48.6 |
38 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 1.72 | 3.9% | 44.3 |
39 | Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC | 1.18 | 2.7% | 44.1 |
40 | San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA | 1.60 | 3.9% | 40.9 |
41 | Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI | 1.23 | 3.1% | 39.3 |
42 | Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA | 1.25 | 3.3% | 38.4 |
43 | Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH | 0.81 | 2.2% | 37.1 |
44 | Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA | 1.07 | 2.9% | 36.4 |
45 | Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT | 0.88 | 2.5% | 35.3 |
46 | Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN | 0.77 | 2.3% | 33.5 |
47 | Rochester, NY | 1.11 | 3.5% | 31.6 |
48 | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA | 0.98 | 3.1% | 31.1 |
49 | Pittsburgh, PA | 1.04 | 3.6% | 29.1 |
50 | New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA | 1.67 | 6.0% | 28.1 |
51 | Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH | 1.07 | 4.6% | 23.2 |
52 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 0.54 | 2.4% | 22.3 |
Image by Transportation for America, Flickr Creative Commons Attribution License.
This isn't a paywall.
We don't have one. Readers like you keep our work free for everyone to read. If you think that it's important to have high quality local reporting we hope you'll support our work with a monthly contribution.