Sign up for our free newsletter
Free D.C. news, delivered to your inbox daily.
The article on Chief Few (“Under Fire,” 8/10) was enlightening for all of the safety, discipline, and morale problems that he has brought on himself. However, the article overlooked one major safety issue. One of the most basic pieces of safety equipment that firefighters have is their Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA). This allows firefighters to breathe while in smoke-filled and oxygen-depleted buildings. SCBAs allow firefighters to enter burning buildingsand show why unequipped civilians never should.
Critical to the functioning of the SCBA is a proper fit. If the SCBA doesn’t seal against the face, it will not work properly and can be a hazard itself. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration recommends that all firefighters have an SCBA fit test at least once a year. But this simple test is not being conducted annually by the D.C. Fire Departmenta fact that has astonished firefighters from other jurisdictions.
Instead of implementing this basic safety check, Chief Few has tried to implement a grooming policy that not only has already been struck down in court but also is based on a spurious appearance of safety. A mustache or beard might interfere with the proper fit of the SCBA mask, but then again it might not. The SCBA fit test would resolve the issue.
Few has already lost in federal courtwhich found the grooming policy to be in violation of the religious freedom clause of the First Amendmentin a suit brought by the local ACLU affiliate. He is also bound to lose at the D.C. Human Rights Office for violating the provision of the D.C. Human Rights Act of 1977, which prohibits employment discrimination based on personal appearance.
A safety-based policy would achieve most of what Few wants to see from the grooming policy. Unfortunately, he has dug his heels in and refused to consider minor changes to the grooming policy that would base it on safety. The policy changes that we in the Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance have proposed would end the ongoing legal battlesand bring the policy into compliance with the Human Rights Act and the First Amendment.
Hair needs to be maintained in a way that doesn’t interfere with the safety equipment. But the determination of what is safe must be through objective safety tests and not through arbitrary grooming standards.
Chief Few can either revise the fire department’s grooming policy and implement yearly SCBA fit tests or wait until the courts and the Human Rights Office impose these common-sense practices on him.
Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, D.C.